Radio Shack FX2 User Manual Page 26

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 32
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 25
The Interface
Letters for The Interface may be sent to any of the following addresses:
U.S. Mail - The Interface, Transoniq Hacker, 1402 SW Upland Dr., Portland, OR 97221
Electronic mail - GEnie Network: TRANSONIQ, CompuServe: 73260,3353, PAN: TRANSONIQ, Internet (via CS): [email protected].
This is probably one of the most open forums in the music industry. Letter writers are asked to please keep the vitriol to a minimum. Readers are
reminded to take everything with a grain of salt. Resident answer-man is Qark Salisbury (CS). Letter publication is subject to space considerations.
Howdy Hackers:
Having avoided any do-it-yourself projects
in the Hacker for some time, I think it's
t i m e fo r us t o t a k e ano t h e r l o o k at wh at w e
can do these days.
With several very popular machines (notab
ly, the Mirage, ESQ-1, and SQ-80), discon
tinued, it's tempting to see what can be
done to enhance their capabilities, which
are considered somewhat limited in 1991.
There are some relatively simple hardware
mods that could give their owners some
slick new possibilities for very little money
or effort, making it a relatively painless way
of getting more from your present invest
ment.
One example would be to add an audio
input to your axe, allowing you to process
external signals through the instrument's
filters and VCAs, giving you a hell of a
powerful way to modulate guitar, vocals, or
other sounds under real-time MIDI control!
Signals could be sent through one or all of
the filter sections simultaneously and the
filter cutoff, modulation depths, and VGA
gain could be varied via note-on, velocity,
and continuous controller messages. Just
think, with 8 VCFs and VCAs, you would
have the ultimate wah-wah of all time!
That's just one of my ideas. Interested
readers are encouraged to write me with
their ideas and suggestions for ESQ/SQ/
Mirage modifications and projects. The
most popular and the ones that can be done
for a reasonable amount of time and money,
w i l l b e r e s e a r c h e d f o r f u t u r e H a c k e r a r
ticles. Your input is strongly encouraged -1
want to develop projects that readers will
w a n t t o b u i l d f o r t h ems e l v es !
Please write me at the address below.
Oh, yeah - please include a SASE if you
want me to reply, and thanks to all of you
for writing.
Sincerely,
C h a r les R. F i sch e r
P. O. Box 537 2
Hercules, CA 94547
(510) 724-0804
[CS - Readers, here's your chance. Seems
to me like Mr. Fischer has made a heck of
an offer here — so let's keep those cards and
letters coming!]
[TH - We did manage to slip in a sample of
Mr. Fischer's projects in this very issue.]
Hacker,
I have an SQ-2 interfaced with an IBM
clone (Compaq) and Cakewalk software. I
w a n t t o u s e t h e P C a s a l i b r a r i a n t o s t o r e
sounds and sequences with Sys Ex mes
sages.
I t doe s n ' t w o rk a s a d v e rti s e d .
I've talked with Ensoniq and 1) slowed
Cakewalk way down and 2) split the file
into two parts as they suggested. The file
seems to come over from the SQ-2 fine, but
going the other way, the SQ-2 locks up and
erases all its RAM. (Tacky) It reinitializes
okay, but everything is lost. Help! If there is
other and better software for this applica
tion, I'd be interested.
Thanks,
Brandon Ahrens
Albuquerque, NM
[CS - I've talked with Ensoniq and they
know of no reason why your system should
not work as advertised. There's a lot of
Cakewalk users out there, and I've never
heard of a problem either. Perhaps one of
them might be able to shed some light, but
in the meantime, I suggest you re-contact
Ensoniq and go over the situation with them
in some detail. And if you haven't done so
already, it might be a good idea to talk to
Twelve Tone Systems, the publisher of
Cakewalk.]
[Ensoniq - We assume that you are trying
to send sequence data, but you don't specify
that. The problem you are experiencing is
caused by the fact that when sending
sequence data the SQ-2 (as all ENSONIQ
products) sends two messages, a header
description and then the data itself. This is
because of the large size of the sequencer
data transmission, which may be larger
than some devices can receive.
Cakewalk is sending back the data as one
c o n t i n u o u s t r a n s m i s s i o n , s i n c e i t i s a
"generic" recorder. As you were instructed,
separating the header from the data with
w h a t C a k e w a l k c a l l s M e t a E v e n t s d o e s s u c
cessfully correct this situation in all of our
tests.
Perhaps you scrambled the memory of your
SQ-2 when you first attempted to download
the data and have not re-initialized the unit
since. Try pressing EDIT Sequence, followed
by Bank button #9 and then Screen button
#9. This brings you to the Reinitialization
mode. If reinitializing fails to correct this,
then you may not have inserted enough time
between the Meta Events.
For users of the Alesis DataDisk just
double-click the RECEIVE button of the
Alesis unit so that it will receive two dumps
of sequencer data.]
Dear Hacker,
Thanks for an excellent magazine that is not
afraid to tackle those problems that are down
to the bits. I'm a serious programmer for
MIDI software (e.g., PM-U20 module for
C-LAB's PolyFrame Universal Editor).
Owning an EPS-16 PLUS, I'd like to give it
some software support for the Atari ST com
puter, which is quite popular in Germany.
I'd like to mention some of the problems
writing MIDI software for the EPS (and
other Ensoniq products like the VFX) that
make editing these devices by an external
computer device almost impossible.
1. The first SysEx reception requires the EPS
to load an overlay. The bad thing is that the
EPS returns "WAIT(OI)" rather than the ex
pe cte d " INS ERT S YST EM D ISK (02 )"
response. The user therefore cannot be in
formed correctly of what to do. If it is poss
ible, Ensoniq should think of making
complete MIDI access possible without the
need to load an overlay.
2. When sending additional SysEx data
while previous messages are processed, the
EPS often locks up.
3. The given delay of 2 seconds between two
SysEx commands is unacceptable. It's im-
26
Page view 25
1 2 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Comments to this Manuals

No comments